On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:09:40 +1000 Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > Python 3.3 has already time.clock_gettime() and time.clock_getres() with > > CLOCK_REALTIME, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, CLOCK_HIGHRES. > > Why does it already have these things when the PEP is not accepted? > > (This is not a rhetorical question, perhaps there is a good reason why > these have been added independently of the PEP.)
Because these are thin (low-level) wrappers around the corresponding POSIX APIs, so there is no reason not to add them. I know you were asking for such wrappers to be in the "os" module, but my understanding is that time-related functions should preferably go into the "time" module. "os" is already full of very diverse stuff, and documentation-wise it is better if time-related functions end up in a time-related module. Otherwise we'll end up having to cross-link manually, which is always cumbersome (for us) and less practical (for the reader). Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com