On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:32, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I prefer to use CLOCK_MONOTONIC, not because it is also available for > older Linux kernels, but because it is more reliable. Even if the > underlying clock source is unstable (unstable frequency), a delta of > two reads of the CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock is a result in *seconds*, > whereas CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW may use an unit a little bit bigger or > smaller than a second.
Aha. OK, CLOCK_MONOTONIC it is then. //Lennart _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
