On 18 Jul, 2012, at 16:59, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: > > Zitat von Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com>: > >> On 18 Jul, 2012, at 7:53, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: >> >>>> What is the status of LLVM nowadays? Is it not a good solution to >>>> write a portable JIT? >>> >>> I don't think it is. It is still slow and memory hungry. The fact that >>> the version that Apple ships with Xcode still miscompiles Python 3.3 >>> tells me that it is still buggy. >> >> Does it miscompile? > > I'm talking about the bug in > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-September/113731.html > >> I regularly run the 3.3 testsuite using the latest Xcode from the Appstore >> on a OSX Lion machine and that works properly. > > I'm not actually using the latest Xcode. So if you could test my test > program, that would be much appreciated.
That bug in llvm-gcc still exists, and is unlikely to get fixed. That's a bug in the integretion of the GCC frontend and LLVM backend, clang (LLVM project frontend + LLVM backend) does work. Ronald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
