On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:05:40 -0700 >Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, the status quo of Idle is not something we should allow to >> continue indefinitely, but decisions about its future development >> should be made by active maintainers that are already trusted to make >> changes to it (such as Terry and Roger), rather than those of us that >> don't use it, and aren't interested in maintaining it. > >Definitely. People shouldn't remain quiescently torpid about the idle >status quo.
The release managers should have a say in the matter, since it does cause some amount of pain there. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
