Am 21.03.2013 00:47, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:05:40 -0700 >>Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, the status quo of Idle is not something we should allow to >>> continue indefinitely, but decisions about its future development >>> should be made by active maintainers that are already trusted to make >>> changes to it (such as Terry and Roger), rather than those of us that >>> don't use it, and aren't interested in maintaining it. >> >>Definitely. People shouldn't remain quiescently torpid about the idle >>status quo. > > The release managers should have a say in the matter, since it does cause some > amount of pain there.
I don't really understand what Antoine's "quiescently torpid" means, but splitting IDLE out to a separate repo and then merging it back every time a release rolls around sounds stupid. Either split it off completely or develop it here (my preferred solution). It's really not that hard to get CPython commit bits. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
