On 09/29/2013 08:55 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com > <mailto:e...@trueblade.com>> wrote: > > On 9/27/2013 9:14 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > I don't see any issue with redirecting the discussion. > python-tulip@ is > > acting like a SIG for the module, so no real precedent beyond it not > > being hosted as a mail.python.org <http://mail.python.org> > <http://mail.python.org> list. > > I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like the discussion to take place > on a python.org <http://python.org> mailing list. I don't want to > log in to a Google > property, and I don't trust them with the mailing list archives. > > I know my voice counts less than active Tulip discussion participants, > but now at least I feel better for having said something. > > > I wish you'd said something a looong time ago when it would have been > easy to move the list. Even if we moved it now we'd have split archives. > Also, I'm not sure where the paranoia comes from. FWIW I'm less worried > about Google reading my personal email than about the python.org > <http://python.org> webmasters reading it.
I wish I'd known the project would be such a success! I have a use for tulip, but not much time to offer development help currently, so I'll live with the outcome. I'd love to see it make 3.4. Eric. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
