On 01/12/2014 11:00 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
And yet I still don't follow what you *want*. Unless it's that b'%d' % (12,) must work and give b'12', and nothing else is acceptable.
Nothing else is ideal. I'll go that route if I have to. I understand that in the real world you go with what works, but in the development stage you fight for the ideal. :)
My reading of Nick's refusal is that %d takes a value which is semantically a number, converts it into a base-10 representation (which is semantically a *string*, not a sequence of bytes[1]) and then *encodes* that string into a series of bytes using the ASCII encoding. That is *two* semantic transformations, and one (the ASCII encoding) is *implicit*. Specifically, it's implicit because (a) the normal reading of %d is "produce the base-10 representation of a number, and a base-10 representation is a *string*, and (b) because nowhere has ASCII been mentioned (why not UTF16? that would be entirely plausible for a wchar-based environment like Windows). And a core principle of the bytes/text separation in Python 3 is that encoding should never happen implicitly.
That could be. And yet the bytes type already has several concessions to ASCII encoding.
By the way, I should point out that I would never have understood *any* of the ideas involved in this thread before Python 3 forced me to think about Unicode and the distinction between text and bytes. And yet, I now find myself, in my (non-Python) work environment, being the local expert whenever applications screw up text encodings. So I, for one, am very grateful for Python 3's clear separation of bytes and text. (And if I sometimes come across as over-dogmatic, I apologise - put it down to the enthusiasm of the recent convert :-))
No worries. I was forced to learn the difference when I wrote my dbf module for 2.5. Took longer than I'd like to admit to realize that ASCII was an encoding. :/
[1] If you cannot see that there's no essential reason why the base-10 representation '123' should correspond to the bytes b'\x31\x32\x33' then you are probably not old enough to have started programming on EBCDIC-based computers :-)
I can see it. :) But bytes already acknowledges an ASCII bias. ;) And even EBCDIC machines speak ASCII when talking telnet.
-- ~Ethan~ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
