[re: "as" clause]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's probably OK to leave it in the deferred section and just note the
> difficulty of implementing it in a backwards compatible way, since
> we're *not* going to be introducing a closure.

Agreed.

-eric
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to