On 30/05/2014 18:40, Mark Roberts wrote:
What I'd really like to see is a Python 2.8 that makes sufficient
changes to Python 2 that writing libraries which cross the boundary
between 2 and 3 is relatively easy instead of a painful nightmarish
chore. Because when push comes to shove, Python 2 support is still
infinitely more important than Python 3.
-Mark
What is the point of flogging a horse that's been dead for so long that
it's already down to a skeleton?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
