On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I already have too many other things on my todo list to work this up into > a full PEP, but the proof of concept (along with IPython's existing > support) shows there's no *technical* barrier to adding the feature. > That doesn't follow. A PoC and even IPython can ignore all kinds of *technical* issues (e.g. giving code that's valid today a different meaning). Please drop this idea or at least take it out of this thread and focus on what *can* and *should* be done, in particular adding warnings with good hints about what went wrong when Python 3 encounters what appears to be a print statement. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
