I must say I completely fail to understand the procedures under which python is developed. If the change (unreviewed, just randomly applied) causes crashes, then surely it should be reverted first and continued on bug tracker instead of lingering (and the complain sitting on bug tracker)?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07.07.15 10:42, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: >> >> On 07.07.15 05:03, raymond.hettinger wrote: >>> >>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c9782a9ac031 >>> changeset: 96865:c9782a9ac031 >>> user: Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com> >>> date: Mon Jul 06 19:03:01 2015 -0700 >>> summary: >>> Tighten-up code in the set iterator to use an entry pointer rather >>> than indexing. > > >> What if so->table was reallocated during the iteration, but so->used is >> left the same? This change looks unsafe to me. > > > There is crash reproducer. > > http://bugs.python.org/issue24581 > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
