FYI, do we have any indication that Raymond even read the comment? IIRC he
doesn't regularly read python-dev. I also don't think code review comments
ought to go to python-dev; the commiters list would seem more appropriate?
(Though it looks like python-checkins is configured to direct replies to
python-dev. Maybe we need to revisit that?)
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:04:34 +0200
> Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I must say I completely fail to understand the procedures under which
> > python is developed. If the change (unreviewed, just randomly applied)
> > causes crashes, then surely it should be reverted first and continued
> > on bug tracker instead of lingering (and the complain sitting on bug
> > tracker)?
>
> +1, especially as the commit doesn't seem to come with any concrete
> explanation of what is being fixed or improved.
>
> ("tighten-up code" is really a platonic motivation... not necessarily
> bad, but should be trumped such as operational concerns, e.g.
> crashes :-))
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
