On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:14:49 +0200 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > FYI, do we have any indication that Raymond even read the comment? IIRC he > doesn't regularly read python-dev. I also don't think code review comments > ought to go to python-dev; the commiters list would seem more appropriate?
Well, do we have to keep a record of what ML each developer reads? Or is post-commit review to be faced each times with dilemmas such as the present: """does this core developer really read that mailing-list? should I email him/her privately, or is that too intrusive? what about writing to that other mailing-list? if they don't answer, did they at least see the message amongst the other threads?""" (this is a nice thing with pre-commit review: you can usually be sure the developer will read your comments, unless there's something seriously wrong with the setup) > (Though it looks like python-checkins is configured to direct replies to > python-dev. Maybe we need to revisit that?) My own preference would be to keep it that way. If python-dev becomes annoying to read, then probably python-checkins isn't very exciting either ;-) (just MHO, of course) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
