On 11.02.16 19:40, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 02/11/2016 06:19 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Thanks for the alternate patch. I used the two-function approach you took
in ast.c for my latest revision.
I still think that some cases (like two of the examples in the PEP,
0b_1111_0000 and 1.5_j) are worth having, and therefore a more relaxed
rule is preferable.
Should I write an alternative PEP for strong rule?
That seems excessive for a minor point. Let's collect feedback for
a few days, and we can also collect some informal votes.
I suspect that my arguments can be lost otherwise.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
