Victor Stinner <victor.stinner <at> gmail.com> writes: > Maybe it's time to move more 3.x buildbots to the "stable" category? > http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable
+1 I think anything that is actually stable should be in that category. > By the way, I don't understand why "AMD64 OpenIndiana 3.x" is > considered as stable since it's failing with multiple issues since > many months and nobody is working on these failures. I suggest to move > this buildbot back to the unstable category. +1 The bot was very stable and fast for some time but has been unstable for at least a year. > - PPC64 AIX 3.x: failing tests: test_httplib, test_httpservers, > test_socket, test_distutils, test_asyncio, (...); random timeout > failure in test_eintr, etc. I don't have access to AIX and I'm not > interested to acquire an AIX license, nor to install it. I'm not sure > that it's useful to have an AIX buildbot and no core developer have > access to AIX, and nobody is working on AIX failures. Maybe HP wants > to help us to support AIX? (Provide manpower, access to AIX servers, > or something like that.) Well, I think in this case it's the gcc AIX maintainer running it, so... I think we should have a policy to stop reporting issues on unstable bots unless someone has a concrete fix OR the bot maintainers are known to fix issues fast (but that does not seem to be the case). Stefan Krah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com