On 3/8/2017 4:07 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:53:04AM +1100, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Oleg Broytman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:
It's also okay to remove much of the content and just leave a placeholder.
The historical record would of course always be available in the vcs.
Thanks! That's what I've planned to do in case we don't remove PEPs.
Why remove the content?
In fact, since its just an informational PEP, why withdraw it? Some
people find it too generic and not enough about Python -- okay. So what?
Is PEP 103 actively harmful?
Certainly not!
I recommend adding a note to the top that the info, which correct, is
somewhat obsolescent (or whatever) with the new workflow. We have PEPs
which are not 'wrong' in that they have been replaced by later PEPs, but
we do not delete them, either in whole or in part.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
