On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:18:51PM -0500, Terry Reedy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/8/2017 4:07 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:53:04AM +1100, Steven D'Aprano
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Barry Warsaw <[email protected]>
> >>>wrote:
> >>
> >>>>It's also okay to remove much of the content and just leave a placeholder.
> >>>>The historical record would of course always be available in the vcs.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks! That's what I've planned to do in case we don't remove PEPs.
> >>
> >>Why remove the content?
> >>
> >>In fact, since its just an informational PEP, why withdraw it? Some
> >>people find it too generic and not enough about Python -- okay. So what?
> >>
> >>Is PEP 103 actively harmful?
> >
> > Certainly not!
>
> I recommend adding a note to the top that the info, which correct, is
> somewhat obsolescent (or whatever) with the new workflow. We have PEPs
> which are not 'wrong' in that they have been replaced by later PEPs, but we
> do not delete them, either in whole or in part.
I see. Thanks!
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ [email protected]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
