For me the current behaviour does not seem unreasonable as it resembles the order in which you write out loops outside a comprehension except that the expression for generated values is provided first.
On 21 October 2016 at 05:03, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > On 19.10.2016 00:08, Rob Cliffe wrote: > >> >> But it's far too late to change it now, sadly. >>> >> Indeed. :-( But if I were ruler of the world and could have my own >> wish-list for Python 4, this (as per the first example) would be on it. >> > > I don't see no reason why we can't make it. > > Personally, I also dislike this behavior. > > > Cheers, > Sven > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
