The PEP index can be found at https://www.python.org/dev/peps/ and there isn't any PEP on this.
But honestly, I don't think this sort of thing should be a PEP. Look at ASGI and how that isn't a PEP and still manages to exist. Since this isn't a language-related or package-related thing I don't think it really needs to go through the PEP process. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jesús Gómez <jgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the PEP-3333[1] they say the following: > > """ > After a sufficient number of servers and frameworks have implemented WSGI > to provide field experience with varying deployment requirements, it may > make sense to create another PEP, describing a deployment standard for WSGI > servers and application frameworks. > """ > > Did this happen already? Will this happen anytime? > > [1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3333/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/SMT3VZKF6KVHJDRVD2OVPN5EMPN4RDCT/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/NAZB76QHU367T6Z63DMFI3Y3YATARNKJ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
