El mar, 12 oct 2021 a las 16:51, Jeremiah Vivian (< nohackingofkrow...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> I posted a previous thread about overloading the unary `+` operator in > strings with `ord`, and that expanded to more than just the unary `+` > operator. So I'm saying now, there should be these implementations: > > +string - `int(string, 10)` (or just `int(string)`) > > -string - `int(string, 8)` > > ~string - `int(string, 16)` > > Or: > > +string - `string.lstrip()` > > -string - `string.rstrip()` > > ~string - `string.strip()` > > If anyone has better ideas, they can post it here. > Your other post mostly attracted sarcastic replies, so I'll be more direct: It's highly unlikely that this will go anywhere. To get a new operator on a builtin type, you'll have to show that: - It's a common operation; - There's no convenient way to do it already; and - The meaning of the operator is reasonably clear to a reader of the code. Recent examples of new features that met that bar are dict | in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0584 and matrix multiply in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/. I don't think any of these proposals come close to meeting those criteria. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/E2NCFN5ASRHTP7HYWXL5DXDZ7LCTHA2G/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/KGAZXAOHVNPAIJQOF6FOI4P6MAPZMZM6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
