On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 05:56, Samuel Muldoon <muldoonsam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The python-ideas mailing list is a very cumbersome way to vet changes to the 
> Python interpreter or other aspects of the python language. If the 
> power-that-be would work with GetSatisfaction people to make a copy-cat of 
> the GetSatisfaction page for Minecraft, I think that the python community 
> could then better drive PEPs (Python Enhancement Proposals)
>

Popularity is a *terrible* way to judge ideas. I'm currently fighting
with another platform on that same topic.

All you can see from a system like that is how many of the popular
ideas get implemented. It says nothing about how many good ideas end
up languishing with a small number of votes, simply because they never
reach critical mass and not enough people see them.

Does GetSatisfaction allow downvotes? If yes: how do you stop a vocal
few from shooting down any idea they don't like? If no: how do you
guard against those who have louder voices being the only ones heard
(in the case of Minecraft, if a major Youtuber were to link to a
report, it would undoubtedly get a lot more votes than one from
someone without such a platform)? There is no way to make a popular
vote fair.

ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WE5LB4PD2K23LLQRFC5LYYSM23N6TEXT/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to