"To table" is a contranym in both the US and the UK.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:53 AM MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2022-02-20 17:56, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Gerrit Holl writes:
> >
> >   > If voting is limited to a select group (which could be as small as
> >   > Python core developers, or as large as anyone who has ever had a pull
> >   > request merged into cpython, or something in-between), then a vote
> >   > could be a way to measure opinions after a lengthy discussion fails
> to
> >   > reach a consensus.
> >
> > I'm not sure what the benefit of "measuring opinions" is supposed to
> > be, when those opinions don't bring real resources with them, and few
> > of them are informed beyond "sounds cool" and "YAGNI".  If a
> > discussion fails to reach consensus, human brains do OK at holding a
> > fairly detailed summary of it, including who held what opinion when
> > discussion ended -- far more informative than the result of a vote.
> >
> > What a vote can do for you is make an up or down decision, or choose
> > among alternatives.  But from the project's point of view, these
> > decisions are rarely pressing (except maybe security fixes, and those
> > are not going to be discussed publicly, let alone put to a general
> > vote!)  If an issue is still controversial after a long discussion,
> > it's usually because there are competing interests in play, and
> > somebody has to lose something they want.  In those cases, it's almost
> > always best to table it, and see if any technical progress is made on
> > reconciling differences about the issue over the next release cycle.
> >
> > Sure, tabling issues frustrates non-committer proponents (who are also
> > usually the proponents of voting schemes, what a coincidence!), but
> > that's normally better than frustrating committers who are against it.
> >
> FYI, the verb "to table" has different meanings in US and UK English. In
> US English it means to remove from discussion, whereas in UK English it
> means to propose for discussion, which is the opposite. On a list that
> has an international reach, it's probably best to avoid the verb
> altogether.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/4XBBEQHGGH5B6XNYYVXOEXG7EDPPLTAJ/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>


-- 
Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food
from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the
uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting
advocates of freedom in prisons.  Intellectual property is
to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LUF6IFXGPWRALUKMUBGUGL3VC6ONS6NB/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to