On Sun, 8 May 2022 at 20:52, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Just a quick straw poll, how would people feel about relaxing the > restriction on the walrus operator so that iterable unpacking is > allowed? > > # Currently a syntax error. > results = (1, 2, (a, b) := (3, 4), 5) > > which would create the following bindings: > > results = (1, 2, (3, 4), 5) > a = 3 > b = 4
I've always thought of relaxing the restrictions. It's actually easy to implement (even including attribute assignment/subscript assignment) and I had to modify only two files (plus regenerate the parser). _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/7LVZLFS4PVJDJF43SVLGCXODDG6BEYLW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
