On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:52 AM Stephen J. Turnbull < stephenjturnb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We (not sure how much help I'll be, but I'm in) need to deal with > Chris A's point that a pure memoizing object doesn't help with the > mutable defaults problem. That is with > > def foo(cookiejar=defer []): > > foo() produces a late bound empty list that will be used again the > next time foo() is invoked. > Yeah... this is a good point, and it is more frustrating to cover the late-bound argument case. I welcome edits to the proto-PEP (you can add yourself as co-author, even if you wind up at -1 on it :-)). I think I'm more-or-less U+1F922 on "deferred deferred" myself. 🤢 -- Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting advocates of freedom in prisons. Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GXVBVCYSTIIA7SVLJYWFDZRBEDRHSUCI/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
