On 2008-06-14, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> And on a personal note: I find it *buttugly*. >> >> Do you mind explaining "why" you find it *buttugly*?
[...] > For the curious: Not the look & feel (albeit I prefer KDE on > linux over Gnome, which is a Qt/GTK thing and thus affects wx > look & feel as well), but the code & the designers. I've never used any of the designers, but I agree 100% that wxPython code is nasty ugly. wxPython has a very un-Pythonic API that's is, IMO, difficult to use. The API isn't really Robin Dunn's fault: wxPython is a very thin wrapper around wxWidgets, so it largely retains the same nasty low-level C++ API that wxWidgets has. I presume much of wxPython is generated in some automated fasion (a la swing). There have been a couple attempts to wrap wxPython in a cleaner, more Pythonic API, but they've have limited success (wax is the one I can think of off the top of my head). -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! If I had a Q-TIP, I at could prevent th' collapse visi.com of NEGOTIATIONS!! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list