On Apr 17, 1:52 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote: > Deep_Feelings wrote: > > qt include many libraries : network , threading,database ..etc while > > Wxwidgets seem similar but with less scope > > > my question is : does these frameworks replace python's (or any other > > language for that matter) built-in libraries ? or python does not > > include that sort of libraries ? > > Some it includes, others it doesn't. And they come with different features. > > While python comes with a lot of included batteries, for some things you > need a more powerful generator - that's where 3rd-party-libraries come into > play. > > There are plenty of discussions about which GUI-toolkit is the best - google > this group. > > However, mostly people agree that Qt is the most powerful, but often was > debunked because of it's licensing. This has changed to the much more > liberal LGPL for Qt4.5. > > Now it might be though that you'd still need to buy a license from Phil > Thompson for his excellent PyQt-wrapping - but I'd personally say it's more > worth than it actually costs given the power of Qt. > > Diez
thank you considering that wxwidget is open source and free do you think that QT lisencing is worth it ? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
