On Apr 17, 10:20 am, Phil Thompson <p...@riverbankcomputing.com> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:04:40 -0700 (PDT), Deep_Feelings > > > > <doctore...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 17, 1:52 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote: > >> Deep_Feelings wrote: > >> > qt include many libraries : network , threading,database ..etc while > >> > Wxwidgets seem similar but with less scope > > >> > my question is : does these frameworks replace python's (or any other > >> > language for that matter) built-in libraries ? or python does not > >> > include that sort of libraries ? > > >> Some it includes, others it doesn't. And they come with different > >> features. > > >> While python comes with a lot of included batteries, for some things you > >> need a more powerful generator - that's where 3rd-party-libraries come > >> into > >> play. > > >> There are plenty of discussions about which GUI-toolkit is the best - > >> google > >> this group. > > >> However, mostly people agree that Qt is the most powerful, but often was > >> debunked because of it's licensing. This has changed to the much more > >> liberal LGPL for Qt4.5. > > >> Now it might be though that you'd still need to buy a license from Phil > >> Thompson for his excellent PyQt-wrapping - but I'd personally say it's > >> more > >> worth than it actually costs given the power of Qt. > > >> Diez > > > thank you > > > considering that wxwidget is open source and free do you think that QT > > lisencing is worth it ? > > wxWidgets, Qt and PyQt are all open source and free - just not the same > open source license. > > Phil
Can PyQt be used in the Qt Creator IDE? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
