On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Old Listener <bill.hunt.walnutcr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 10:20 am, Phil Thompson <p...@riverbankcomputing.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:04:40 -0700 (PDT), Deep_Feelings >> >> >> >> <doctore...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Apr 17, 1:52 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote: >> >> Deep_Feelings wrote: >> >> > qt include many libraries : network , threading,database ..etc while >> >> > Wxwidgets seem similar but with less scope >> >> >> > my question is : does these frameworks replace python's (or any >> >> > other >> >> > language for that matter) built-in libraries ? or python does not >> >> > include that sort of libraries ? >> >> >> Some it includes, others it doesn't. And they come with different >> >> features. >> >> >> While python comes with a lot of included batteries, for some things >> >> you >> >> need a more powerful generator - that's where 3rd-party-libraries come >> >> into >> >> play. >> >> >> There are plenty of discussions about which GUI-toolkit is the best - >> >> google >> >> this group. >> >> >> However, mostly people agree that Qt is the most powerful, but often >> >> was >> >> debunked because of it's licensing. This has changed to the much more >> >> liberal LGPL for Qt4.5. >> >> >> Now it might be though that you'd still need to buy a license from >> >> Phil >> >> Thompson for his excellent PyQt-wrapping - but I'd personally say it's >> >> more >> >> worth than it actually costs given the power of Qt. >> >> >> Diez >> >> > thank you >> >> > considering that wxwidget is open source and free do you think that QT >> > lisencing is worth it ? >> >> wxWidgets, Qt and PyQt are all open source and free - just not the same >> open source license. >> >> Phil > > Can PyQt be used in the Qt Creator IDE?
I don't know - ask on the PyQt or Creator mailing lists. Phil -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
