On 24-07-2009, Christian Tismer wrote: > On 7/24/09 1:04 AM, William Dode wrote: >> On 23-07-2009, Christian Tismer wrote: > ... > >>> Wasn't the project plan saying the opposite, borrowing >>> some ideas from psyco? :-) >>> http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan >> >> How do you see the future of psyco when unladen-swallow will grab the >> best of psyco (if they can !) ? > > I have no objections, but also no idea so far how that could work. > Sounded like an unreflected idea to me, without seriously > checking the possibilities and/or implications. The same > kind of research apparently did not happen concerning PyPy, > which IMHO is much more suitable to take advantage from. > > This is for the current status of psyco, of course. > It will change dramatically in the next months, slowly > adopting some of PyPy's ideas. Then it might start to > make more sense.
I didn't understand how psyco could use somes PyPy's ideas, i thought it's only the opposite... So i was going to read the PyPy's documentation : it's fascinating !!! But how to test it ? The doc says : "When PyPy is translated into an executable like pypy-c, the executable contains a full virtual machine that can optionally include a Just-In-Time compiler." Where is this 'option', is there somethings to activate it ? thx -- William Dodé - http://flibuste.net Informaticien Indépendant -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list