In message <mailman.2046.1277445301.32709.python-l...@python.org>, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 25Jun2010 15:38, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> > wrote: > > | In message <2010062422432660794-angrybald...@gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson > | wrote: > > | > Why would I write this when SQLAlchemy, even without using its ORM > | > features, can do it for me? > | > | SQLAlchemy doesn’t seem very flexible. Looking at the code examples > | <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/examples.html>, they’re very procedural: > | build object, then do a string of separate method calls to add data to > | it. I prefer the functional approach, as in my table-update example. > > He said "without using its ORM". I noticed that. So were those examples I referenced above “using its ORM”? Can you offer better examples “without using its ORM”? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
