On 2010-06-25 19:47 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message<mailman.2046.1277445301.32709.python-l...@python.org>, Cameron
Simpson wrote:
On 25Jun2010 15:38, Lawrence D'Oliveiro<l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
wrote:
| In message<2010062422432660794-angrybald...@gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson
| wrote:
|> Why would I write this when SQLAlchemy, even without using its ORM
|> features, can do it for me?
|
| SQLAlchemy doesn’t seem very flexible. Looking at the code examples
|<http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/examples.html>, they’re very procedural:
| build object, then do a string of separate method calls to add data to
| it. I prefer the functional approach, as in my table-update example.
He said "without using its ORM".
I noticed that. So were those examples I referenced above “using its ORM”?
Can you offer better examples “without using its ORM”?
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/sqlexpression.html
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
