Please don't be unnecessarily cruel and antagonistic.

-- Devin

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 20:43, alister wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:27:26 -0700, wxjmfauth wrote:
>>
>
> [snip the garbage]
>
>
>>>
>>> jmf
>>
>>
>> Your error reports always seem to resolve around benchmarks despite speed
>> not being one of Pythons prime objectives
>>
>> Computers store data using bytes
>> ASCII Characters can be used storing a single byte
>> Unicode code-points cannot be stored in a single byte
>> therefore Unicode will always be inherently slower than ASCII
>>
>> implementation details mean that some Unicode characters may be handled
>> more efficiently than others, why is this wrong?
>> why should all Unicode operations be equally slow?
>>
>
> I'd like to dedicate a song to jmf.  From the "Canterbury Sound" band
> Caravan, the album "The Battle Of Hastings", the song title "Liar".
>
> --
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what
> you can do for our language.
>
> Mark Lawrence
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to