Mark Lawrence <breamore...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/02/18 11:23, John Ladasky wrote:
> > 
> > I haven't visited GMane in a few years, but I found it difficult to 
> > navigate. 
> In particular, I found searching to be cumbersome. Weren't the archives 
> broken into 30-day blocks? 
> > 
> > I just tried GMane again two minutes ago. I can't confirm my recollections, 
> but right now what I'm seeing is worse. If you follow this link right now... 
> (http://gmane.org/find.php?list=comp.lang.python)... you get this: 
> > 
> > "Not all of Gmane is back yet - We're working hard to restore everything"
> > 
> > And if you follow the link labeled "The latest news is at Gmane News" 
> at the bottom of that page, it takes you here... (http://home.gmane.org/)... 
> and the top blog post discussing site repairs is dated September 2016! 
> 
> > 
> > I'm not too excited about trying GMane again after seeing that.
> > 
> 
> Please don't waste your time with the gmane website.  Just point any 
> (semi-)decent mail client like Thunderbird at news.gmane.org and you've 

Surely you mean NNTP/Usenet client.

> access to hundreds of Python lists and thousands of other technical 
> lists.  I find the search facilities perfectly adequate.
> 

-- 
Chris Green
ยท
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to