On Thursday 18 February 2010 07:59:44 Sylvain Thénault wrote: > On 17 février 01:38, Fletcher Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm looking into fixing this bug, but I don't have a very good > > understanding of where I should start tackling this bug. Can any > > body recommend a file or a set of files in the source where I should > > concentrate my efforts? > > that's rather a new feature than a bug ;) This is a new check that > could be added for instance to the 'base' checker (eg > pylint/checkers/base.py). Basically, you should: > > * add a visit_raise method that will check the nature of the raised > expression to detect potential misusage of a 2-uple
Actually, any N-uple with N>=1 shoud trigger this. And even a 0-uple should probably trigger a warning as these are always False and this would be a statement without effect. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France) Formations Python, CubicWeb, Debian : http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure : http://www.logilab.fr/services Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science _______________________________________________ Python-Projects mailing list Python-Projects@lists.logilab.org http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/listinfo/python-projects
