But tests taking 1.48 longer to run on average!
Anything I should know about 3.6 and performance?

On 18 November 2016 at 22:42, Luca Sbardella <luca.sbarde...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Pulsar's tests are now run against 3.6-dev and all passing.
> Nice!
> Getting used to the C Future ;-)
>
> On 13 October 2016 at 06:37, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Ben.
>>
>> Both are very helpful information!
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ben Darnell <b...@bendarnell.com> wrote:
>> > [+async-...@python.org, which is the new home for these kinds of
>> > discussions]
>> >
>> > Tornado's tests are now failing on nightly with "TypeError: can't send
>> > non-None value to a FutureIter":
>> > https://travis-ci.org/tornadoweb/tornado/jobs/167252979
>> >
>> > -Ben
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:55 PM INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > If you have asyncio based project, and it uses Travis-CI,
>> >>
>> >> > please add "nightly" to your .travis.cnf [2].
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> > [2]
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/python/#Choosing-
>> Python-versions-to-test-against
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Travis changed the "nightly" version to 3.7
>> >>
>> >> Now "3.6-dev" is for Python 3.6beta (Still 3.6b1, it may be upgraded
>> >> soon).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> INADA Naoki  <songofaca...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> INADA Naoki  <songofaca...@gmail.com>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://lucasbardella.com
>



-- 
http://lucasbardella.com

Reply via email to