On Thursday 27 October 2005 05:08, guy keren wrote: > > I can hack an html2wiki for the transfer; it can be converted back > > when we are done if needed. > > > > * The Python-IL mediawiki is not quite hebrew-friendly at present. > > Putting up a small moinmoin sounds like best approach to me. > > Nir, what's your advice? > > > > * Licensing: you still haven't decided, right? > > if someone can find a good license that will cover what i originaly talked > about - i'll be happy to use it. > > i'll repeat - the study plan (along with its reference material) should be > very open - for everyone to do anything with it. BSD-tyle license? is > there something like this that suites documentation? i don't know.
There is the Creative Commons Public Domain: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ And there is the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Regards, Shlomi Fish > > the mini-book should be free for use in any way - i don't know yet about > free for editing. unlike the study plan, which i expect to be very fluid > and adapted to suite the teacher of such a course, the mini-book is a more > "closed" and complete work - and it is very easy to ruin such work by > non-coherent editing. also, because this mini-book represents much more > work, i'd rather have it under a GPL-like license - i.e. the source must > be given together with the thing, even if it is a printed book that's > being sold for a hefty price, and any changes made to it must be published > to anyone who's given the "binary" (printed book, pdf, whatever) file. > > i understood the GFDL has some problems - is there some license that > overcomes these problems? what license do the debian people use for > mini-books? what license is used by the guides of the LDP? You can try the CC-Attribution-ShareAlike license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the bottom 5%.
