On Wednesday 26 October 2005 11:12, Nir Soffer wrote: > > * Could you put it on some public version control? It will simplify > > keeping updated and managing changes. > > If you do, I prefer tla <http://www.gnuarch.org/> >
tla has several problems: 1. It is not portable to Win32, and porting it there is not a priority of its main developer. 2. It is no longer maintained and will be replaced by GNU Arch 2.0. 3. Several common operations in it require a great deal of commands. 4. It has some confusing commands: "tla mv" does one thing and "tla move" does something else. 5. A checkout requires checking out the entire history. (if the history is very large - it becomes a problem). Subversion ( http://subversion.tigris.org/ ) has none of these deficiencies and is also very slick, very fast, algorithmically-sane, feels wonderful to use, etc. You can distribute it using svk. So I recommend using Subversion instead. Whatever we choose to use, CVS should be avoided like the plague - it is incredibly Evil. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the bottom 5%.
