El sáb, 05-11-2005 a las 20:30 +0200, Shlomi Fish escribió: > You should use a VCS for anything that undergoes a few revisions. > > Guy, anything you can say to your defense? > He already did: he said he has no time to bother with it. It might or might not be wise but it's his decision.
I do have time for it (or so I think ;-). No time to learn Arch (which didn't strike me as friendly enough) but to use Subversion which I already know. Project Location: http://OpenSVN.csie.org/hazor_python or https://OpenSVN.csie.org/hazor_python ViewCVS: https://OpenSVN.csie.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=hazor_python Anybody else is invited to work there. I'm not reading mail every day to give logins on request, so anybody is invited to use username 'hazor' and password 'hazor' ;-). So far I've created an upstream/ directory with Guy's html and scripts to import it, convert it to rst_ text and back to html. The conversion works OK on the small top pages and the reference but is too bad for the book - I'll tackle that later (not too hard to fix by hand if anybody wants it now). Now after all this automation I still haven't got my changes checked it :-). Soon to follow... P.S. I even activated the Trac wiki: https://opensvn.csie.org/traccgi/hazor_python in case anyone want's to use it. I personally don't see much use for it here. Note that the wiki pages you edit on it are *not* part of the SVN repository.
