On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:58 AM Rudi Hammad <[email protected]> wrote:
> oh, ok. Thanks for the tip. > > if the api 2.0 is more pythonic, wouldn´t be better to stay with the old > api if you are planning on transforming you code to c++? > Some people do the test with python because you don´t have to compile, and > when the code works, they do it in c++. > With this workflow, does it make more sense using the old api or it al the > same? > I can only speak for myself on this, but I feel it would be the the same either way. You either know the C++ api or you don't, and one should be able to port the intent from python to c++ regardless of whether the python code was in the new or old api. Really it is just loops, arguments and error handling that are different. Logic should be exactly the same. My 2cents. > >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Python Programming for Autodesk Maya" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/python_inside_maya/f6dcdac7-0c03-4e1d-b894-71c7c7b69fa3%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/python_inside_maya/f6dcdac7-0c03-4e1d-b894-71c7c7b69fa3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Programming for Autodesk Maya" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/python_inside_maya/CAPGFgA0TjzizgwYywJQDf5SCM5LHTfs_mrYh_fS%3D7n7LE575tA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
