2011/1/7 Simon Ihmig <ih...@kaliber5.de> > Hi Thomas, > > thanks a lot for your quick response! > > Am 07.01.2011 09:44, schrieb Thomas Paviot: > > I would answer 'yes' to all of your questions : pythonocc is suitable >> for your project *but* the criteria 'less than 1s' to perform the >> different operations has to be considered regarding the type of product. >> If the configurable product is a car or an aircraft, with thousands of >> parts, then it's not possible to achieve configuration (from input to 3D >> output) in less than 1s. Actually, I doubt that any CAD kernel would do >> it, even with mutiprocessed/multitasks kernels. >> > > No, it will be quite a simple object compared to a car. Maybe comparable to > a single steering wheel of a car! ;) > > Regarding the collada export issue, is pytonocc -> vrml -> collada the way > to go? Or is a direct collada export possible, maybe planned for the future? > > Greetings, > > Simon > > Direct Collada export from pythonocc is not possible. I fully agree it would be a great feature, but nothing's planned yet.
Thomas
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
