jayvdb added a subscriber: jayvdb.
jayvdb added a comment.

One of the easy checks in the original task description is not yet implemented:

- There should be no I… references but instead always git commit hashes.

That is ~ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P1881 line 186

Then the non-trivial follow-on from that in the original task description is 
yet to be implemented:

- Commit hashes which point to commits in <same repo> should only point to past 
(merged) commits.

It would also be good to introduce a strict syntax for referring to commits in 
other repos.

And another hard one that I would like is a standardised way of referring to 
regressions, with a reference to the commit where the regression occurred.  
This will help automated identification of changes which need to be 
cherry-picked to other branches based on whether the regression commit exists 
in the branch.

It would be good to standardise the list of other rfc822 headers which are 
allowed in the message tail.  e.g. Signed-off-by , Original-author:/Co-author: .
Do other repos normally allow 'Conflicts:\n    foo' which git automatically 
adds?


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T109119

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: jayvdb
Cc: jayvdb, Jdforrester-WMF, JanZerebecki, Legoktm, bd808, gerritbot, hashar, 
greg, Aklapper, pywikibot-bugs-list, XZise



_______________________________________________
pywikibot-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot-bugs

Reply via email to