On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 05:23:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 10:57:45AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 12:35:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > CI is only exercising the qcow2 'auto' tests currently. As a result we
> > > get no exposure of changes which cause regressions in other block format
> > > drivers.
> > > 
> > > This adds new CI jobs for each block format, that will run the target
> > > 'make check-block-$FORMAT'. The jobs are separate so that we have the
> > > ability to make each formats gating or not, depending on their level
> > > of reliability.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  .gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> > 
> > The idea makes sense to me.
> > 
> > Did you have a link a URL of a CI run that failed tests on NBD, where
> > I might be able to help make the tests more deterministic?
> 
> Its the one in the cover letter - the nbd job is
> 
>   https://gitlab.com/berrange/qemu/-/jobs/11633680715

I finally managed to run 'git bisect' on an old enough version to
track down two of the NBD failures, broken since v9.0.0:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-10/msg03063.html

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libguestfs.org


Reply via email to