Re-use arm_is_psci_call() instead of open-coding it. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> --- target/arm/hvf/hvf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c index 52199c4ff9d..7a99118c8c2 100644 --- a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c +++ b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c @@ -2084,7 +2084,7 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu) break; case EC_AA64_HVC: cpu_synchronize_state(cpu); - if (arm_cpu->psci_conduit == QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC) { + if (arm_is_psci_call(arm_cpu, EXCP_HVC)) { if (!hvf_handle_psci_call(cpu)) { trace_hvf_unknown_hvc(env->pc, env->xregs[0]); /* SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2 says every unknown SMCCC call returns -1 */ @@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu) break; case EC_AA64_SMC: cpu_synchronize_state(cpu); - if (arm_cpu->psci_conduit == QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC) { + if (arm_is_psci_call(arm_cpu, EXCP_SMC)) { advance_pc = true; if (!hvf_handle_psci_call(cpu)) { -- 2.49.0