Re-use arm_is_psci_call() instead of open-coding it.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/hvf/hvf.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
index 52199c4ff9d..7a99118c8c2 100644
--- a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
+++ b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
@@ -2084,7 +2084,7 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
         break;
     case EC_AA64_HVC:
         cpu_synchronize_state(cpu);
-        if (arm_cpu->psci_conduit == QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC) {
+        if (arm_is_psci_call(arm_cpu, EXCP_HVC)) {
             if (!hvf_handle_psci_call(cpu)) {
                 trace_hvf_unknown_hvc(env->pc, env->xregs[0]);
                 /* SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2 says every unknown SMCCC call returns 
-1 */
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
         break;
     case EC_AA64_SMC:
         cpu_synchronize_state(cpu);
-        if (arm_cpu->psci_conduit == QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC) {
+        if (arm_is_psci_call(arm_cpu, EXCP_SMC)) {
             advance_pc = true;
 
             if (!hvf_handle_psci_call(cpu)) {
-- 
2.49.0


Reply via email to