On 19 December 2013 14:01, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Fedorov Sergey <s.fedo...@samsung.com> > wrote: >> "Banked system control registers have two copies, one Secure and one >> Non-secure." >> > > Ok fair enough. I will wager though that sooner or later ARM will find > a reason to bank a reg other than sec-ext. But let's stick to their > terminology which by that quote its quite clear that "banked" means > "banked for security" (No change needed).
Well, the other register banking is the gp regs which get banks for user/svc/fiq/etc in AArch32. But I think in the context of system registers "banked register" is fairly clear. thanks -- PMM
