On 12/20/2013 06:33 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > This sounds like it could work, though there are some wrinkles for > registers with readfns/writefns -- do we have extra s vs ns read/write > functions, or just one set of functions which has to look in env->ns to > figure out whether to use the S or NS version?
What about defining a separate ARMCPRegInfo for each banked AArch32 system register? I think it would be close to AArch64 concept. It would allow to use separate read/write handlers if necessary or reuse the same handlers otherwise. When the handlers is not used, the translation code would simply lookup the ARMCPRegInfo for corresponding secure state and use the field offset. Best regards, Sergey Fedorov
