On 03/15/2016 11:08 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 03/09/2016 04:02 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
On 03/08/2016 04:04 PM, Yang Hongyang wrote:
Hi Chen,
What's the motivation that you want to change this name? The
function actually is not
intent to iterate every filter.
Right. but this function isn't always pass packet to *a* next filter.
Actually, it iterates filters until the packet is stolen(filter
receiving handler return non-zero).
In other words, packet could be handled by several filters at this
function.
BTW, it's difficult to determine what name is better.
Thanks
Li Zhijian
Right, so I was considering a better function name (though I'm not a
native English speaker).
But I agree qemu_netfilter_iterate() is not perfect too, may need more
thought.
let's drop this patch temporarily ?
Thanks
Li Zhijian
