On 03/15/2016 11:33 AM, Li Zhijian wrote: > > > On 03/15/2016 11:08 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> >> On 03/09/2016 04:02 PM, Li Zhijian wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/08/2016 04:04 PM, Yang Hongyang wrote: >>>> Hi Chen, >>>> >>>> What's the motivation that you want to change this name? The >>>> function actually is not >>>> intent to iterate every filter. >>> >>> Right. but this function isn't always pass packet to *a* next filter. >>> Actually, it iterates filters until the packet is stolen(filter >>> receiving handler return non-zero). >>> In other words, packet could be handled by several filters at this >>> function. >>> >>> BTW, it's difficult to determine what name is better. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Li Zhijian >> >> Right, so I was considering a better function name (though I'm not a >> native English speaker). >> >> But I agree qemu_netfilter_iterate() is not perfect too, may need more >> thought. >> >> > let's drop this patch temporarily ? > > Thanks > Li Zhijian >
Right, let's change it when we have a better name. Thanks
