Markus Armbruster writes: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > [...] >> if we move away from C I'd rather >> it to be a language that's nicer than C rather than one that's >> uglier and larger and still retains all of C's flaws.
> Seconded strongly. Just curious. Do we agree though that moving selected pieces like the code templates with macros to C++ templated functions, or QOM to C++ classes would be an improvement over the current C code without any dramatic changes in the codebase? (I don't think more than that is needed) Cheers, Lluis
