Lluís Vilanova <vilan...@ac.upc.edu> writes: > Markus Armbruster writes: > >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> [...] >>> if we move away from C I'd rather >>> it to be a language that's nicer than C rather than one that's >>> uglier and larger and still retains all of C's flaws. > >> Seconded strongly. > > Just curious. Do we agree though that moving selected pieces like the code > templates with macros to C++ templated functions, or QOM to C++ classes would > be > an improvement over the current C code without any dramatic changes in the > codebase? (I don't think more than that is needed)
I don't think we do.
