On 2016年09月19日 19:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 19/09/2016 02:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 15/09/16 07:04, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 13/09/2016 09:11, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The tap backend is already using qemu-bridge-helper to attach tap
interface to a bridge but (unlike the bridge backend) it always uses
the default bridge name - br0.

This adds a "br" property support to the tap backend.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
Stupid question ahead: how does -netdev bridge compare to -netdev tap
after this patch?  Is there a case left where you must use -netdev bridge?

Or can we make -netdev bridge a synonym for "-netdev
I looked through history but I could not understand why "bridge" was
introduced in the first place as even there (a7c36ee4920ea) is an example of

-netdev tap,helper="/usr/local/libexec/qemu-bridge-helper --br=qemubr0",id=hn0

so it was assumed even then that people might want tap on a specific bridge.

So my stupid question is - what do I have to do to get this accepted
(besides a note that it is 2.8+) or it is not interesting to anyone? :)
I think the patch is even more interesting because it lets us simplify
the code for -netdev bridge.


According to http://wiki.qemu.org/Features-Done/HelperNetworking. Looks like this allows creating a third party backend without modifying qemu. And the bridge helper is an example for this.

Reply via email to